Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Categories of Questions

 

 

 

Course Requirements

How do I choose a project?

Choosing an appropriate project is crucial to success in this course. I believe that just about anything can be taught using the procedures you learn in this course, but clearly some topics and skills lend themselves to instructional design ideas better than do others. Use the page of guidelines for a project to help you narrow down your choices. In Spring, 2008, the projects will be individual ones.

What is my grade based on?

Your grade is based on three major elements. The project is the most important, accounting for 150 out of 230 points. This website describes the project in detail and provides directions for completing it. Next is the final examination or project. This varies from semester to semester and focuses primarily on aspects of instructional design that are not covered well in the project. It counts for 30 points. Finally, there is a "participation" requirement, measured by points gained for posting on the discussion boards. You can earn up to 50 points either by posting very good messages (e.g. questions that others respond to) or by posting lots and lots of less substantive ones.

How will the projects be graded?

The projects will be graded according to a set of criteria found on this website. If those criteria change at all during the semester, they will be made more specific and precise, and the changes will be relatively minor. As always, I will inform you of any changes.

When should I post to the discussion board?

Early and often! I recommend reading the discussion board at least every couple of days and posting twice a week. If you get behind in posting, you can do extra the next week, but do not wait until the end of the semester to fulfill this requirement. Postings done in haste at the end are not impressive and often do not meet the criterion of being "substantive."

Do I have to submit my project Analysis Phase for tentative grading?

No. This is meant as an opportunity for you to get enough feedback from me for you to see where you stand in your grade. When I started teaching this course, I sometimes received complaints that students didn't know their grades until the course was complete. This is a problem, so I started grading projects after the Analysis Phase was complete. I will have given you feedback on the content on pieces of the project already, but this will let you know actual points. It is optional, however. If you don't want to hand this in, that's your decision and will not be held against you.

What does the tentative grade mean?

It means that you will get at least that many points for the Analysis Phase of the final project. At the end of the course, I will grade all the projects over again from scratch. If you have a tentative grade on file, then you will either get it or do better. You will not go down.

Submitting assignments

How do I send an assignment?

Usually, the best way to give me assignments, right up until you hand in the final version of your project, is to email them to me. All email systems now allow you to attach files to an email message. Most of your assignments will be completed in a word processing program, such as Microsoft Word, so you would create the document, type and edit, and save it. When it is all finished, I would like you to save it as a Rich Text Format file and attach that to an email. Please be sure that your name is in the document and that you use a fairly meaningful filename. These steps will help me identify what you are sending and whose assignment I am reading. More information is available at Submitting Your Assignments. Note that you could put your entire project on a website of your own and simply send me the addresses of specific parts.

How do I attach a file to an email?

Usually quite easily, although the procedure may vary somewhat depending on your email system. See the page on Submitting Your Assignments for more information.

Class groups

Are there groups this semester?

In Spring, 2008, the projects are individual ones, and there will be no formal ongoing groups. There may be groups assigned temporarily in specific classes.

How do I find out what group I am in?

In the first week or two of class, I will form the groups based on mutual interests and preferences. I will inform everyone of her or his group and provide online tools that the group can use to communicate and collaborate.

How do I find out when my group will meet?

Each group can make up its own work plans and schedules. There will be tools to allow synchronous online meetings. Some groups may find that geography allows them to meet in person. If so, please keep me informed of when you meet and what progress you make. Please note that it would not be considered collaborative to meet regularly or frequently with only part of the group present. If individuals can't make it, then the group should make other arrangements by meeting online or using a discussion board instead of a real-time meeting.

Why are we doing this?

I'm planning to be a school librarian. Why do I need this course?

The Library and Information Science and Instructional Technology programs have discussed this issue and agree that this course is important for future (or present) school librarians. The professional societies in the field concur. Why? Because the librarian/media specialist holds a unique position in a school. You are one of the few people able to be at the center of instructional and educational questions, changes, and improvements. Being able to take a systematic instructional design perspective can help you work with teachers (individually or in groups) and affect the instructional directions of the school.

The overall instructional design and development process

How does this differ from what I already do?

Some of the things in the instructional development process are already familiar to you, at least on a superficial basis. Other parts may be partly or completely new to you. Overall, there are a few clear differences between this process and your usual practice: 1. this is more systematic, 2. this is more detailed (sometimes excruciatingly so), 3. you may not have thought about specific pieces before.

Needs Assessment

How can I gather information about the needs of my students? I have only a week.

Right, so you have to do the best you can. This problem is why Needs Assessment is still part of the final exam/project--we don't have time to do it fully. In fact, at another university I used to teach an entire course on Needs Assessment and related topics. Here, you need to take your knowledge of and experience with the learners and the topic to make the case for there being a need. If you have access to existing data, that can improve your assignment.

Instructional Analysis

How do I divide my project goal into the major steps?

This can be difficult at first. There is not necessarily any single right way to do this. What you are looking for are the 3-7 major things that people have to do (physically, mentally, etc.) to accomplish the overall goal. Remember that this is not laying out how you will teach the goal; it is looking at the goal from the standpoint of someone who can already do it. The question is What do they do?

Do I have to list every detail of how someone does the task?

Pretty much, yes. This is an exercise in making sure that you have covered all the details. As you go deeply into the task, however, you may find that you have gotten to the point of trivial details (e.g. "read the letter w" or "move index finger to T key and twitch it"). If you are certain that your audience knows how to do these things, then you have probably gone deeply enough into that aspect of the task.

Are all projects going to be skills? How about knowledge and other goals?

Projects do not have to be skills, but it does seem to be true that, for beginners, the ID process is easiest to apply to skill instruction. Pure knowledge goals (e.g. state capitals) are not much fun for either you or the students and require somewhat different approaches to instructional design. At the same time, most skills, especially cognitive ones, often require knowledge objectives as well.

Do I have to draw a flowchart?

Not necessarily. The way that you represent your instructional analysis varies depending on what goals you are analyzing. The key thing to remember is that the goal here is communication. You are trying to convey to others (especially to me) exactly what one does while performing the task in question. This might be done using a flowchart, a hierarchical diagram, an outline, or in some other way.

What software is available to draw the flowchart?

There are several possibilities. Some people have done reasonably well with just the drawing tools in Microsoft Word or PowerPoint. Others have one of the "works" programs, which include more capable drawing programs. Specialized software for drawing diagrams like this include Inspiration, SmartDraw, Edge Diagrammer, and others. If you search for these programs on the Web, you can often find free downloads (that work for a month or so).

How do I decide what is entry behavior and what I should teach?

There is no hard and fast rule on this. It depends on your content and your audience.

How detailed should the analysis be?

Very. I mean it!

Learner Analysis

How can I find out about my learners without spending weeks on this step?

This can be very difficult. The best ways of gathering information about learners and their characteristics are testing, existing records, personal experiences, interviewing teachers, interviewing the students, and so on. We do not have time to do all of these things. For our purposes here, you will probably have to rely on observations and experience for most of your information. If you have access to existing records such as test scores, use it. Talk to previous teachers of these students, if you can.

Do I have to do a complete Learner Analysis?

Yes, but "complete" might vary slightly from one project to another. Those categories in the table are there to help guide you, but you may find that they don't fit your project perfectly. You might find that in some of the categories you (1) can't think of any significant characteristics or (2) can't generate any important implications from them. In these cases, you can leave that category out and concentrate on the ones that make a difference.

Context Analysis

What is the difference between the learning context and the performance context in education?

In education there is often no difference at all, unless we consider what students will do with the skills once they leave school. In many cases, however, the performance context is simply where they do the tests or other assessments, and this may be the identical classroom where they learned the material. In a case like this, you might find that you can leave much of the context analysis off. Again, you want to concentrate on the parts that will make a difference to your instruction.

Performance Objectives

Do I have to have an objective for each little piece of the analysis?

Yes. These objectives guide both your student assessments (including assessing prerequisites) and the design of your instructional materials. They are needed in this process.

Student Assessment

Do I need a prerequisites test?

Usually, yes. Most goals, when you think about it, have some sort of entry skills that are needed before someone can successfully learn the goals and subgoals. The prerequisites test is meant to measure the readiness of the student to proceed with your instruction.

Do I need a pretest?

Usually yes. The pretest is usually similar or identical to the posttest. In both cases, you are trying to find out how much of the material the learners know. The pretest might tell you that any specific learner does not need the instruction at all. In the case of this project the pretest is essential for knowing whether anyone benefited from the instruction when you do the formative evaluation. Sometimes there are sound practical reasons for not actually using the pretest, of course: danger to student or equipment, overtesting of students, and so forth.

Should the pretest and posttest be the same?

It depends on what you are teaching. Sometimes they have to be the same: changing a tire is the same before or after the instruction. Other times you can keep the structure of the assessment the same but vary the content: math problems are a good example of this. Always keep in mind that the goal of the pretest and posttest are identical: to measure how much someone knows (and can do). The only real difference is when the assessment is administered.

How do I decide whether to do a test or some other assessment?

Your objectives tell you this. You should match your assessments to the objectives. Math, grammar, various standard academic subjects may lend themselves to paper-and-pencil tests. Other things do not. We would not assess someone's ability to serve a volleyball with a multiple choice test or even an essay. The same is true of many other skills.

Design Document and Instructional Strategies

What is the Design Document?

The Design Document is the place where you present the blueprint for how you plan to teach the unit that you are designing. It will cover the instructional strategies, the media, and specific instructional tactics that you will use. In these projects, the Design Document may seem somewhat superfluous, since the units themselves are pretty small. However, when you scale the ID process up to larger projects, the Design Document becomes essential. Think of building a small birdhouse without a plan. You might be able to do it, right? Now think of building a ten-room house. That would be almost impossible, because it is too large and complex. Well, a multimedia instructional website, covering a entire college level course is more like the house--large and complicated. The Design Document provides a blueprint so that you can get the audio, video, text, quizzes, and everything else you need to make the instructional website work. The one you are doing is practice for doing that. This is also a part of the process where I like to encourage creativity.

What elements are required in the Design Document?

I like to see several things in a good instructional Design Document:

  • A narrative that lays out (in a paragraph or two) your general approach to the instruction, including your overall instructional strategy and the media you have chosen to deliver it.
  • A list of the major objectives you will be teaching, grouped and sequenced.
  • A description of how you will teach each group or cluster of objectives, using either the nine events of instruction (Gagne's approach, as covered in the PowerPoint presentations on this site, both narrated and unnarrated). Again, this should be done for each group of objectives.

Do I have to teach the parts of my topic in any particular order?

You will have to make decisions about what order you will teach the various objectives and subobjectives in your project. These decisions are part of developing your instructional strategy. Depending on your topic, your audience, and your setting, you could use a variety of sequences for your instruction. Sequences include chronological, backward chaining, learner-controlled, whole-to-part and part-to-whole, simple-to-complex, and many others.

Do I have to teach each objective separately?

No. Although the old behaviorists did it this way, we rarely do so now. Instead, we cluster (group, chuck, etc.) the objectives and teach several together. The basis for this clustering is the interaction of the goals of the instruction and the learners. For example, physics is generally regarded as a difficult subject, but advanced graduate students can handle large chunks of it at once, where high schoolers may have to be taken through the concepts step-by-step. Other topics might be easy for us but have to be broken down much further for young children.

What are the Nine Events of Instruction?

Based on cognitive psychological theory and research of his time, Robert Gagne postulated that we needed to do nine things externally in order to increase the probability that learners would process information and learn things internally. The nine external events that should occur in teaching are

  • Gain Attention
  • Inform the Learner of the Objectives
  • Stimulate Recall of Prior Learning
  • Present Stimulus Material
  • Guide the Learner
  • Elicit Performance
  • Provide Feedback
  • Assess Performance
  • Enhance Retention and Transfer

These are presented in this order but may sometimes be done in other orders. They need to be present for each cluster of objectives that you are teaching. Clearly, they still present a great deal of room for variation and creativity in how you accomplish each one.

Materials Development

Are you (the instructor) going to review my materials before I try them out with students?

No, there really isn't time. I'd rather have you spend the time using the unit with students than waiting for me to respond to you. Besides, by the time you are at this point, we both know whether you are on the right track.

Do I have to have a self-instructional unit?

The standard project for this course is a self-instructional unit that takes your audience about an hour to complete (no, it doesn't have to be done all at once, though). There may be good reasons to have a teacher-led unit instead. Here are two possible reasons: 1. the audience doesn't read well enough to do a self-instructional unit or 2. the content and instructional strategy need a person there to do things like assess student responses. Please use the Design Document to tell me this kind of thing so that I can comment on it.

What is a self-instructional unit?

This means that you can hand the materials to the student and reasonably expect them to get through the unit without anyone else helping. At least that's the goal. It might not happen in the first tryouts, but that's what the Formative Evaluation is for.

Formative Evaluation

How do I do the Formative Evaluation for my project?

We are doing the first type of formative evaluation for these projects: the one-on-one tryouts. In these tryouts you will need to try out the instruction on only three members of your target audience. You should do them one at a time, unless your design requires groupwork. You should test your learners, give them the instructional materials and observe them as they use them, taking good notes. You ARE allowed to help out if someone gets stuck, rather than let them flounder, but make sure that you note the problems carefully. At the end, you should give the learners the posttest. The test scores, your notes, and comments from the learners provide the data for your evaluation. More information can be found in a page on conducting your tryout.

In the tryout, am I allowed to help the students if they can't do something in the lesson?

Yes, especially in this first round of tryouts. It is better to help the students over the rough patches and have them finish than to leave them hanging. Try not to jump in too soon, and make sure you document what you did in the FE report. Presumably having to help the students would lead to Revisions.

Revisions

When I identify things that have to be changed during the Formative Evaluation, do I have to make those changes before handing in the project for grading?

No. All I ask you to do is tell me what the changes will be in your Formative Evaluation and Revisions Report. You do not actually have to go back and make the changes. The reason is that we simply do not have time.

Summative Evaluation

Are we going to do a Summative Evaluation of our projects?

No. We will discuss Summative Evaluation in class, but we do not have the time to complete this step.

The Final Project/Examination

Will the final examination be comprehensive?

No. It covers only those parts of the ID process that you do not do completely in the project.

What do I have to study for the final examination?

The things not covered fully while doing the project include needs assessment, media selection, formative evaluation and revisions, summative evaluation, and future directions of instructional technology and instructional design. See the page about the final for objectives and examples.

Why do you call it a project/examination?

Although I used to give an exam that took most people about an hour, an online course does not lend itself to that. I have been experimenting with various other ways of assessing your knowledge in these areas, including small individual and group projects. I will give your more information as the course progresses.


© Albert L. Ingram, Ph.D. Revised: February 13, 2008