Identifying the Causes of Needs
Identifying the need is the first step. Doing so
can ensure that we are working on a significant problem. The
second step is to figure out why that need exists. The cause may
not always be the obvious or politically correct one. However,
if we do not address the real cause(s), then there is less
chance that we will solve the problem. If we put time and money
into solving the problem and fail, then that is time and money
that was wasted. Better to focus in on the real causes.
Thomas Gilbert identified six different types of
causes for people not performing the way they should:
information, resources, incentives, knowledge and skills,
capacity, and motivation. He discussed them in this order
because they go, at least roughly, from the easiest (and
cheapest!) to fix to the most difficult. In addition, the first
three refer to variables in the environment, while the other
three refer to variables within the person. Let's look at each
one briefly.
Information. The most basic thing that
everyone needs to know in order to do well at any task, whether
academic or work-related, is information. First, they have to
know what the task is, how it is to be done, where to find
further information or materials, how it is to be assessed, and
so forth. You might be surprised at how many jobsites and
classrooms do not provide this basic information. In addition,
people have to get information about how well they are doing the
task. Without feedback on performance they cannot even maintain
their level of performance, let alone improve.
Tools and Resources. The second necessary
component for performing well is access to the necessary tools
and resources. Nowadays, these can refer to a wide variety of
things, including computers, software, machines,
paper-and-pencil, adequate workspace, and much more. Clearly
without a number two pencil, a student cannot do well on a
standardized test. Without a high-quality lathe, a worker cannot
produce parts to the right specifications. We can all think of a
multitude of other examples.
Incentives. People do not do well on
tasks if they have no reason to care about it. Sometimes we can
count on the intrinsic motivations of students and workers.
Often we cannot. One way around this is to examine the
incentives in the environment. When you do this, it is important
to see them from the performer's point of view, not the school
administration's or the company's. For example, a recent
administration of twelfth-grade proficiency tests at a local
high school resulted in much lower than expected scores. Problem
was, although the school administration and teachers really
wanted the students to do well, the students had few incentives.
The tests did not count for anything (including graduation), and
the students didn't get anything out of them. It really wasn't
too surprising that many students did not do as well as they
might have. Examples in the workplace also abound.
Knowledge and Skills. Often the first
thing that people think of when solving a problem in performance
in school or on the job is teaching and training. However, this
will work only in those situations where you are sure that the
cause of the problem is a lack of knowledge and skills. As we
have seen, sometimes people do poorly for other reasons entirely
out of their control. The high schoolers mentioned above may
have known a lot more than the tests revealed. Teaching it to
them all over again is unlikely to help if the incentives aren't
changed. Similarly, in the example cited above of the safety
videotape, it is quite possible that most of the workers already
have a good grasp of the safety procedures. If so, then a new
training program (this time on videotape) is not going to change
much. Instead, it would be better to examine what other factors
might be causing the rise in the accident rate. Teaching and
training can be quite expensive and time consuming; don't do it
when people already have the needed knowledge and skills. Robert
Mager has a simple test to determine this. It is called the
"Gun to the Head Test." It's simple: ask yourself,
"If I held a gun to their heads, could they do it?" If
the answer is "yes," then they have the knowledge and
skills. If the answer is "no," then you may have to
teach them.
Capacity. Capacity and ability refer to
the internal capabilities of the people themselves. If the
capacity is not there, then probably no amount of incentives,
training, and so on is likely to solve the problem. If the task
involves lifting and moving extremely heavy equipment, then a
"ninety-pound weakling" may not be up to the job. In
that case you might have a couple of choices. First, you could
find a task better suited to the actual capabilities of the
person. Second, you could change the task. For example, the
purchase of a good forklift might bring the job within the
capacity of a much larger group of people. In education, we
usually deal with mental capacity more than physical. Although
this area can be more controversial, it is also true that most
of us recognize that someone with low math abilities might never
do well in physics and accounting courses.
Motivation. Whereas incentives are
external to the person, motivation is internal. In spite of all
of the motivation speakers we have seen or the books we have
read, it seems to be true that the underlying deep-seated
motivation of individuals to do well on tasks can be extremely
difficult to change. That's why it comes last on this list.
Interestingly, though, for most people that only rarely turns
out to be a problem, especially at the beginning of a task, a
job, or a school career. Most of us want very much to succeed
(even if we're not always too clear on how to do it). Most of us
start a new situation (job, degree program, whatever) hoping and
expecting to do well. We fantasize about how well we are going
to do: impressing our superiors or even better members of the
opposite sex, winning awards, getting good grades or significant
raises. The real question is often not "How do we motivate
people?" but "What did the situation do to destroy
their motivation?"
|