Gather Information about the Task
Often you will be designing instruction on material that you do not
know well (or at all). In those cases, it is important to gather
information to be sure that your analysis is complete and accurate.
There are a variety of sources of such information, depending on the
task you are analyzing.
For some tasks the first pass (and maybe the only one you will need)
is your own knowledge. If you are teaching material that is very
familiar to you or that you developed in the first place, you may be the
best expert on it around. If you have a great new pre-writing technique
for your students, it might be unique, but you would still want to
analyze it to make sure that it is complete. If you do rely on yourself
as subject-matter expert, then you should be sure to check the results.
For example, if you are analyzing tasks involving using a computer
program, do not rely just on memory. Sit down at the computer and go
through the steps, taking notes as you do. Sometimes you might want to
have someone else check your analysis, too.
For some tasks, there are numerous sources of documented information.
Go to any bookstore and you will find plenty of information on how to
use Microsoft Excel, for example. These are often good sources of
instructional analysis information. Again, however, you should probably
check it to make sure that it is complete and accurate.
For many tasks, you have have to go directly to the people who
already do the tasks to gather your information. There are at least
three ways you can do this: surveys, interviews, and observations.
Surveys of a group of people can help you get an inventory of what tasks
they do, the importance of the tasks, and so on. Surveys are rarely
useful in gathering detailed information about specific tasks, however.
Interviews can be good to gather verbal information and to understand
key concepts. They can also help you get an overview of how to do many
kinds of tasks.
Observations of actual performers are often the most direct means to
gather information about how people really do things (as opposed to what
they tell you, which is likely to be different). This is especially true
of psychomotor tasks or those with a significant psychomotor component,
since these are more easily observable than cognitive tasks.
Finally, for many cognitive tasks it might be possible to use
research techniques developed by psychologists to understand mental
activities such as problem solving. Sometimes, a search of the
literature will reveal that the task, or one like it, has already been
studied by psychologists.
|